/image%2F1488937%2F20210729%2Fob_3921fe_cellules-mortes-detournement.jpg)
Mira todos esos fragmentos de células muertas matando de hambre y envenenado las células del cultivo. Llamémoslos virus y digamos que fueron creados por un virus que se apoderó de las células
¿Una persona en su sano juicio mezclaría una muestra de un paciente (que contiene varias fuentes de material genético y que nunca se ha demostrado que contiene un virus en particular) con células de riñón de mono, suero bovino fetal y medicamentos tóxicos, y luego afirmaría que el brebaje resultante es un "aislado de SARS-COV-2" y lo enviaría al extranjero para su uso en investigaciones críticas (incluyendo el desarrollo de vacunas y pruebas)?
Porque este es el tipo de trabajo fraudulento que los equipos de investigación de todo el mundo hacen pasar por "aislamiento de virus".
A partir del 27 de julio de 2021:
87 instituciones científicas y sanitarias de todo el mundo no han proporcionado ni citado ni un solo informe de aislamiento/purificación del "SARS-COV-2" por parte de nadie, en ningún lugar y en ningún momento.La lista de estas instituciones se enumeran a continuación.
A continuación figuran todas las solicitudes de información y sus respuestas archivadas en cv19.fr, consulte los procedimientos completos de cada solicitud detallados en esta página: fluoridefreepeel.ca [archivo]
(1) Australia: University of Western Australia – home of Gates-funded researcher Christine Carson
(2) Australia: ACT Government (Government of the Australian Capital Territory) / Canberra Health Services (CHS)
(3) Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation – CSIRO
(4) Australia: Department of Health
(5) AustraliaPeter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity
(6) Britain: Health and Safety Executive
(7) Canada: Aylmer Police Services
(8) Canada: Centre for Disease Control, British Columbia
(9). Canada: City of Toronto, Ontario
(10 )Canada: Department of Health & Community Services, Newfoundland Labrador
(11) Canada: Health Canada
(12) Canada: Institut National de Sante Publique du Quebec
(13) Canada: Institutes of Health Research
(14) Canada: Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox and Addington Public Health, Ontario (re “any variant”)
(15) Canada: McGill University
(16) Canada: Ministry of Health, British Columbia
(17) Canada: Ministry of Health,Ontario
(18) Canada: Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario
(19) Canada: National Research Council, [2]
(20) Canada: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
(21) Canada: Peterborough Police Service
(22) Canada: Peterborough Public Health
(23) Canada: Provincial Health Services Authority, British Columbia
(24) Canada: Region of Peel, Ontario, [2]
(25) Canada: Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario
(26) Canada: Toronto Police Service
(27) Canada: University of Toronto
(28) Canada: Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, British Columbia (re “the UK variant”)
(29) Canada: Grey Bruce Health Services
(30) Canada: McMaster University
(31) Canada: Public Health Agency of Canada, [2]
(33) Czech Republic: Ministry of Health
(34) Czech Republic: Univerzita Karlova
(35) Denmark: Statens Serum Institut
(36) England: Public Health England, [2], [3], [4]
(37) Europe: Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
(38) India: Indian Council of Medical Research, [2]
(39) Isle of Man: Department of Health and Social Care
(40) Netherlands: Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, [2]
(41) New Zealand: Associate Minister of Health Hon Jenny Salesa
(42) New Zealand: Associate Minister of Health Hon Peeni Henare
(43) New Zealand: Associate Minister of Health Julie Anne Genter
(44)New Zealand: Bay of Plenty District Board
(45)New Zealand: Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet
(46)New Zealand: Institute of Environmental Science and Research – ESR, [2]
(47)New Zealand: Ministry of Health
(48) New Zealand: University of Auckland
(49) New Zealand: University of Otago
(50) Norway: Norwegian Ministry of Health and Cares Services & subordinate agency the Directorate of Health
(51)Portugal: Ministry of Health (jugement du tribunal formalisant que le ministère ne dispose d’aucune donnée ou référence sur l’existence du virus)
(52) Republic of Africa: Governmental COVID-19 Advisory Committee (jugement Afrique du Sud, en savoir plus)
(53) Republic of Africa: Minister of Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs
(54) Republic of Africa: National Department of Health
(55) Republic of AfricaNational Institute for Communicable Diseases
(56) Republic of Africa: President
(57) Republic of Columbia: Ministry of Health & Social Protection
(58) Republic of Ireland: National Virus Reference Laboratory, University College Dublin
(59) Scotland: Public Health Scotland
(60) Slovenia: Department of Health
(61) Slovenia: Faculty of Medicine and Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ljubljana
(62) Slovenia: National Laboratory for Health, Environment and Food (Nacionalnega laboratorija za zdravje, okolje in hrano – NLZOH)
(63) Spain: Ministry of Health
(64) United Kingdom: Cabinet Office, [2]
(65) United Kingdom: Department of Health and Social Care
(66) United Kingdom: Government Office for Science
(67) United Kingdom: House of Commons
(68) United Kingdom: House of Lords
(69) United Kingdom: Imperial College London
(70) United Kingdom: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency
(71) United Kingdom: Prime Minister’s Office, lien vers cette réponse
(72) United Kingdom: University of Warwick
(73) USA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, [2]
(74) USA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, [2]
(75) USA: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases – NIAID, [2]
(76)USA: Oregon Health Authority
(77) Uruguay: Clemente Stable Biological Research Institute, Ministry of Education and Culture
(78)Uruguay: University of the Republic (UdelaR) Faculty of Chemistry
(79) UruguayMinistry of Public Health
(80) WalesPublic Health Wales, [2]
(81) Canada: Hastings Prince Edward Public Health (Ontario)
(82) Ukraine: Ministry of Health
(83) Australia: Western Australia Minister & Department of Health
(84) Australia: South Australia Minister for Health and Wellbeing
(85) AustraliaNew South Wales Ministry of Health, Australia
(86) England: Pennine Acute National Health Service Trust
(87) England: Salford Royal National Health Service Foundation Trust
Algunas de las respuestas a estas solicitudes de información mencionan el hecho de que el aislamiento/purificación del SARS-CoV-2 no puede realizarse de la manera solicitada, y que el "aislamiento" mencionado en la literatura científica se refiere a un cultivo celular de muestra que muestra un efecto citopático, pero no se han realizado experimentos de control para demostrar que este efecto citopático está presente o no con los mismos procedimientos en un cultivo sano o estéril (ver FOI de los Países Bajos).
Vea también: Stefan Lanka dirige experimentos de comprobación que refutan la virología
Artículos originales:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/68-health-science-institutions-globally-all-failed-to-cite-even-1-record-of-sars-cov-2-purification-by-anyone-anywhere-ever/
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
Descargue todos los documentos de solicitud de información:
https://files.catbox.moe/8gx9ft.zip
Fuente: cv19
/image%2F1488937%2F20241003%2Fob_361ff1_adobe.jpg)
/image%2F1488937%2F20241003%2Fob_2602d9_israelterroriststate-pppa.jpg%3Fitok%3DvOCWdroO)
/image%2F1488937%2F20241003%2Fob_482f29_avvxsejcpr0ejuigv2j2oztpvw4pm-oje9vipd)
/image%2F1488937%2F20241002%2Fob_72df95_1ba6f1a3-84a2-47f8-bec4-697ab0d61669-1.jpeg)
/image%2F1488937%2F20241003%2Fob_361ff1_adobe.jpg)
/image%2F1488937%2F20241003%2Fob_2602d9_israelterroriststate-pppa.jpg%3Fitok%3DvOCWdroO)
/image%2F1488937%2F20241003%2Fob_482f29_avvxsejcpr0ejuigv2j2oztpvw4pm-oje9vipd)
/image%2F1488937%2F20241002%2Fob_72df95_1ba6f1a3-84a2-47f8-bec4-697ab0d61669-1.jpeg)
